In a recent social media post, Pastor K. Doyle of the Seventh-day Adventist Church shared a thought-provoking explanation titled “A Rationale for Building a Replica of the Image in Daniel 2.” His statement aims to bring theological understanding and calm to what has become a heated discussion among local church communities over the controversial statue.
According to Pastor Doyle, the purpose of constructing a replica of the Daniel 2 image is not for worship, but rather for education and spiritual reflection. He explained that the statue serves as a visual representation of God’s sovereignty over human kingdoms, reminding believers that all earthly powers will eventually fall, and God’s eternal kingdom will stand forever.
“A church may choose to build a replica of the image in Daniel 2 to visually illustrate the prophetic message of God’s sovereignty over earthly kingdoms,” Pastor Doyle wrote. “It serves as a tangible reminder of God’s kingdom that will ultimately replace human empires, encouraging the congregation to trust in God’s eternal plan.”
Five Benefits Highlighted by Pastor Doyle1. Educational Tool: Helps members understand prophecy and God’s control over history (Daniel 2:44).2. Evangelistic Opportunity: Invites curiosity and discussion about biblical prophecy and Christ’s return.3. Spiritual Reminder: Reinforces that God’s kingdom is everlasting (Daniel 2:35).4. Motivates Faith: Strengthens believers’ confidence that God’s kingdom will outlast all earthly powers (Psalm 146:3-4).5. Community Engagement: Fosters shared experiences that build unity and faith among members.
However, Pastor Doyle was careful to acknowledge that there are potential disadvantages to consider.
Two Possible Disadvantages1. Misinterpretation: In cultures where religious images are uncommon, replicas may be misunderstood, leading to accusations of idolatry (Exodus 20:4).2. Legal or Cultural Conflicts: In regions where public religious symbols are restricted, such displays could spark controversy or legal disputes, shifting attention away from the gospel’s message.
Doyle further clarified the biblical foundation for his reasoning by outlining the Commandment in Exodus 20:4–5, which prohibits making or worshiping graven images. He emphasized that the sin lies not in the creation of an image, but in the act of worshiping or serving it.
“The biblical context is that God’s people should not make any graven image for the purpose of worshiping it,” he wrote. “Making images of anything is not inherently sinful; it is the worshiping of the image that God forbids.”
As the discussion continues, one of the central questions now being raised is whether Antiguan law prohibits the erection of such a statue. Legal experts and community leaders are being called upon to provide clarity on this matter.
For now, Pastor Doyle’s balanced approach has brought a measure of theological insight and calm to a debate that has caused significant division within the Christian community. Many hope his explanation will help shift the focus back to understanding prophecy and promoting unity rather than contention.