Amid growing public scrutiny of the public service, calls are intensifying for increased accountability not just among Permanent Secretaries, but also within the ranks of government directors. Concerns have been raised about the effectiveness, transparency, and leadership at the director level across various government ministries and departments.

While recent shifts in Permanent Secretary appointments have made headlines, some stakeholders argue that such changes only scratch the surface. They contend that a deeper, more systemic overhaul is needed — one that includes a critical review of directors who hold significant influence over the daily operations and implementation of government policies.

“There’s a glaring need to look beyond the top layer,” a source close to the matter stated. “Directors are just as pivotal in shaping how departments function. If we’re serious about public sector reform, we can’t ignore that.”

Critics argue that without this level of introspection and action, issues such as bureaucratic bottlenecks, inefficiency, and lack of innovation will persist. They are calling for performance audits, leadership evaluations, and a merit-based approach to promotions and reappointments.

As public demand grows for a more agile and responsive government, many are watching closely to see whether the necessary attention will be paid not just to the figureheads but to the leadership framework within. The conversation has clearly shifted — and so, they say, must the system.